Skip to content

Specialist to GP reply template

Australian documentation guide

A specialist reply body that distinguishes the assessment, care provided, medicine changes, requests to the GP and follow-up. It makes responsibility for the next steps explicit when that responsibility was stated.

The blank template

How to fill it in

  1. Copy the blank template into your record system.
  2. Fill in what was discussed or assessed. Keep uncertainty visible, and use [not stated] where required information is missing.
  3. Check the details and any gaps before saving or sharing. The clinician must explicitly confirm any generated content.

Diagnosis and impression

Record the specialist’s stated conclusion and its certainty. Distinguish an established diagnosis from a working impression or unresolved question. Do not infer a diagnosis from investigations or treatment alone.

History and findings

Summarise the relevant account and findings from this assessment. Identify information taken from outside records and examination limitations. Describe reported symptoms separately from observed findings, with dates where established.

Investigations and results

Record investigations reviewed, their relevant results and any outstanding status. Distinguish a result already reviewed from one ordered or awaited. Do not interpret a pending result or imply that an enclosure was sent without checking.

Management provided

Record what was actually done, discussed or offered at the specialist encounter. “Provided”, “discussed”, “declined” and “planned” are different statuses. A proposed intervention is not a completed one.

Medication changes

Record changes explicitly made, including the established medicine details, change and stated reason. Separate an authorised change from a recommendation for the GP to consider. Do not supply a missing dose or imply that the person has begun a newly prescribed medicine.

Actions for the GP

List the specialist’s explicit requests, with responsibility and timing when stated. Distinguish a request from an accepted handover or completed action. If ownership is unclear, leave it visible rather than assigning it by convention.

Follow-up

Record the agreed follow-up service, status and timing when known. Distinguish booked, requested and awaiting allocation. A review interval or discharge from specialist care must have been stated, not inferred from a reassuring assessment.

Safety netting

Record advice actually given, who received it and any stated contact or escalation route. Preserve the clinician’s wording and uncertainty. The template does not generate warning symptoms or instructions that were absent from the consultation.

Common omissions

A medication recommendation can be mistaken for an implemented change, and a request for the GP can look like an accepted responsibility. Pending investigations and follow-up status need explicit wording.

Review before sending

Check that conclusions retain their certainty and each proposed or completed action has the correct status. Confirm that medication changes, GP requests and specialist follow-up do not contradict one another. Check the intended recipient and enclosures in the letter workflow.

Worked examples

A reply after assessment of a hearing concern

Fictional example. Made up for this guide; no patient record was used. It shows how to write a record, with gaps left visible. It is not a care plan or a record to copy into someone's chart.

DIAGNOSIS / IMPRESSION: Specialist records a hearing concern awaiting formal audiometry; no final hearing diagnosis is made in this fictional reply.
HISTORY & FINDINGS: Person reports difficulty hearing conversation on the right for three months. Specialist records clear canals and intact tympanic membranes.
INVESTIGATIONS & RESULTS: Audiometry has been requested; a result is not yet available.
MANAGEMENT PROVIDED: Specialist discussed the assessment and the purpose of audiometry with the person. Written appointment information was provided.
MEDICATION CHANGES: No medicine was started, stopped or changed at this visit.
ACTIONS FOR THE GP: GP is asked to supply any earlier hearing-test report if one is found in the record. No new prescribing action is requested.
FOLLOW-UP: ENT service will review the audiometry result and contact the person with the next appointment details. The service retains responsibility for that result.
SAFETY-NETTING: Specialist records that the person was given the service contact details and advised to seek clinical review if their symptoms change.

Reply after an administrative review of referral information

Fictional example. Made up for this guide; no patient record was used. It shows how to write a record, with gaps left visible. It is not a care plan or a record to copy into someone's chart.

DIAGNOSIS / IMPRESSION: No new diagnosis is supplied in this fictional administrative review.
HISTORY & FINDINGS: Specialist reviewed the referral information; a clinical appointment has not yet occurred.
INVESTIGATIONS & RESULTS: One referenced report was not available in the documents received.
MANAGEMENT PROVIDED: No clinical management provided in this administrative review.
MEDICATION CHANGES: No medicine-change decision is supplied.
ACTIONS FOR THE GP: Referring practice is asked to send the referenced report.
FOLLOW-UP: Appointment arrangements will be communicated separately.
SAFETY-NETTING: [not stated]

Related templates

Start a consult with this template, free

Approved for publication by Tyson, 4 October 2026

Sources

Free to copy and adapt this template and guide, including for use in your practice. Sources linked above retain their own terms.

Use this guide to help write the record. It provides no clinical advice. The clinician remains responsible for checking that the record is accurate and complete. Check Medicare requirements, statutory forms and local policies separately.